Charlie's Goldfish Reactions...
This is what Gil said:
"FUCK THIS GUY --- Review # 5! Overall, I thought people really liked it... they all seem to mention too much 9/11 stuff... how do you feel about that?"
This is what my brother, Derek had to say about the five reviews:
"I thought the reviews were very good. You got all high marks. Only one bad review and even it said some pretty good things. The so called bad comments were just constructive criticism. Some of their thoughts and ideas were good suggestions. I agree with the consensus of all reviewers... it was a very good script. And yes... I'd pay to see this movie. Now, on to those mooks who did the reviews...
Reviewer # 1 is either a well educated (dork) or a chick.. Reviewer # 2 is a girl... no doubt.... Two words:Beautiful Girls! And yes, Reviewer # 3 (a guy) would rent that Timothy Hutton flick too... R # 4 gave a perfecto diez! This reviewer has to be an older gent... possibly a teacher of some sorts. He gave a good review. Could it be Jim Lipton? Only kidding... R # 5 could be a guy or a girl. They said you had talent as a writer and they are correct. I think their opposing view idea is true (I'm sure you would've come up with that angle had you had more time to edit the script). But I also think they believe they are really smart and are the foremost expert at writing a screenplay. Some sort of zen guru screenwriter with punk attitude. Ha!!! Maybe this person might be one of those people who lives in LA (nay... or possibly even some sort of wannabe) and thinks that just b/c they know so and so's personal assistant and have written several screen treatments, then that makes them in the "biz" (and of course hotshit). They might even have an agent. May I have a cappucino latte whatever with some fancy LA salad and my testicles please. Thank you.
So, 2 rentals, 2 would pay to see the movie, and 1 no show. That's pretty good any which way you look at it.
No comments:
Post a Comment